Global consumers, by and large, have more shopping choices at their disposal than ever before. Whether they shop at a specialty retailer or a mass merchandiser, on a computer or a mobile device, they have never had so many ways to please the palate, discover the deal or pay the piper. For retailers, differentiating your brand in such a crowded space is not only critical, it is also more difficult than ever.
A retail loyalty program can be an effective way to create competitive advantage by reducing customers’ likelihood to switch stores. Indeed, more than seven in 10 loyalty-program participants in Nielsen’s Global Loyalty-Sentiment Survey (72%) somewhat or strongly agree that all other factors equal, they will buy from a retailer with a loyalty program over one without. Loyalty programs can also help drive more frequent visitation and heavier purchasing. Nearly three-quarters of global loyalty-program participants (74%) agree that loyalty programs make them more likely to continue doing business with a company, and two-thirds (67%) agree that they shop more frequently and spend more at retailers with loyalty programs.
Brick-and-mortar retailers are not the only ones benefiting from loyalty-program participation. Two-thirds of global respondents (66%) agree they’d shop more at online retailers if these sellers provided loyalty benefits similar to those of traditional in-store retailers. And increasingly, loyalty programs are at the leading edge of technology as retailers incorporate advanced analytics, mobile experiences and other digital solutions into their programs.
And many shoppers appear to love loyalty programs. In fact, 66% of global respondents say they belong to one or more programs. But there is often a large gap between the number of programs in which shoppers are enrolled and the number in which they actively participate. So what distinguishes the winners from the rest of the pack? While many tried-and-true retail loyalty-program fundamentals can be applied anywhere in the world, there also are unique differences by country. For example, mobile loyalty apps are particularly appealing in India and China, while non-monetary retail loyalty reward programs are important in Morocco. Knowing what program attributes resonate best with your customers will equip you to drive engagement.
“Loyalty programs are intended to ultimately increase a retailer’s share of the consumer’s wallet,” said Louise Keely, executive vice president, Nielsen Global Retail Practice. “But loyalty programs cannot be designed in a one-size-fits-all manner. There are big differences in loyalty program preferences and habits across countries, and across consumer groups within countries. These differences include how consumers want to use technology to engage with their loyalty program, what tangible benefits they are seeking from loyalty programs, and even how much they care about loyalty programs. Retailers need to determine who they want to bring into the store or onto the website more, and design a loyalty program for them.”
Other findings include:
For more detail and insight, download Nielsen’s Global Retail Loyalty-Sentiment Report. If you would like more detailed country-level data from this survey, it is available for sale in the Nielsen Store.
The Nielsen Global Loyalty-Sentiment Survey was conducted March 1-23, 2016, and polled more than 30,000 online consumers in 63 countries throughout Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East/Africa and North America. The sample includes internet users who agreed to participate in this survey and has quotas based on age and sex for each country. It is weighted to be representative of internet consumers by country. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated. However, a probability sample of equivalent size would have a margin of error of ±0.6% at the global level. This Nielsen survey is based only on the behavior of respondents with online access. Internet penetration rates vary by country. Nielsen uses a minimum reporting standard of 60% internet penetration or an online population of 10 million for survey inclusion.