Analysis by Emily Luger, Nielsen Online
The Iranian election is yet another watershed moment in the ongoing evolution of news and media, further blurring the lines between being, reporting, and following the story. In the two weeks since the controversy and conflict surrounding the election, a number of insights have emerged about how the Internet and social media continue to be a transforming force for the News industry. Initial Nielsen analysis of search results provides some conclusions, while others areas beg additional probing.
|Google Search Results: Est. 2:30 PM Thursday, June 18, 2009|
|Rank||Iran||Iran Protest|| Iran|
|7||Tehran.edu||AFP Google Article||NY Times||Middleeast.about.com||Politico.com|
In a follow-up snapshot on June 24, a marked shift takes place, reaffirming the Iran election story as a watershed moment for online news and communications:
|Google Search Results: Est. 3:30 PM Wednesday, June 24, 2009|
|Rank||Iran||Iran Protest||Iran Election||Moussavi||Ahmadinejad|
What this means is that general human curiosity is driving people to look to all available sources for information. The conflict in Iran presenting the latest and perhaps most sophisticated example of how the world has changed for journalists, the media and increasingly active media consumers alike.
So what else do the search results signify? Is consumer generated media (news by the people, for the people) eclipsing traditional sources? Are people more frequently linking to Wikipedia than the New York Times for information about Iran? What does it mean that Mashable is among the top three search results for “Iran Election?” What role does Twitter play? As major events break (Iran, Health Care, Michael Jackson) we will continue to dive into the data and present answers to these questions, both through our own analysis and through feedback and opinions of others. After all, if weve learned anything in the last few weeks, it's that the power is in the hands of the people... What do you think?