Pular para o conteúdo
02_Elements/Icons/ArrowLeft Voltar para o Insight
Insights > Publicidade

Perspectivas: Quer um anúncio bem sucedido? Seja criativo

6 minutos de leitura | Carl Marci, neurocientista chefe | Outubro 2017

Recentemente, uma manhã, uma discussão improvisada eclodiu no escritório sobre o que faz uma grande publicidade. Discutimos alguns de nossos anúncios recentes favoritos e, como se pode imaginar, o leque de sugestões sobre o que era melhor era amplo. Forma curta e forma longa. Engraçado e sentimental. Orientado pelo produto e focado na marca. Racional e emocional. Embora variassem em comprimento e objetivo, uma coisa era clara: eram anúncios "imperdíveis" - não de preenchimento entre as pausas do programa, mas grandes criativos sobre os quais queremos falar, compartilhar e vigiar e mais uma vez.

Fui lembrado da importância da grande criatividade ao rever os resultados de um novo projeto de pesquisa conjunto da Nielsen Catalina Solutions (NCS) e da Nielsen. Os resultados reforçaram uma velha serra de publicidade: criativo é rei! Criativo é o que impulsiona aquilo com que nos engajamos, compartilhamos, falamos, debatemos, lembramos e compramos. Criativo tem um grande poder, independentemente de onde, quando e como ele funciona. O anúncio da Apple em 1984 para apresentar o computador Macintosh continua sendo um dos mais falados de todos os tempos e rodou uma única vez na TV nacional.

O estudo procurou quantificar a contribuição de vendas de cinco fatores-chave que contribuem para a eficácia da publicidade: criatividade, alcance, direcionamento, recenciamento e contexto. Os resultados do estudo mostram como o equilíbrio relativo entre esses motoristas mudou com o tempo e como ele funciona através da TV e dos canais digitais. O aspecto mais interessante para mim foi que os resultados demonstraram que a qualidade criativa contribui tanto para o sucesso de uma marca no mercado quanto todos os outros fatores combinados. Além disso, o estudo descobriu que quando a criatividade é forte, ela é o grande impulsionador do sucesso no mercado: até 80% para a TV tradicional e 89% para a publicidade digital. Por outro lado, quando criativo é fraco, o aumento das vendas é fraco na TV e no digital, e outros fatores de mídia são os principais impulsionadores.

Grande criatividade, em resumo, continua sendo o fator mais importante para o sucesso de qualquer campanha publicitária, tanto na TV tradicional quanto nas plataformas digitais. Novas ferramentas e técnicas podem aprimorar, ampliar e melhorar o alcance das metas, e novos formatos e destinos parecem surgir a cada dia para ajudar os anunciantes a encontrar seus consumidores. Mas eles simplesmente não conseguem igualar o poder que a grande criatividade proporciona quando se trata de conduzir campanhas publicitárias verdadeiramente bem-sucedidas.

This, of course, raises several questions: What is great creative? How do marketers know if their creative is “great?” And how do they achieve great success with it?

In the past, marketers have relied on qualitative and/or quantitative self-report copy testing to evaluate creative. Essentially, they made decisions based on biased consumer responses often aided by their professional eyes and instincts. Essentially, they went with what they thought would work. While this may have kept very poor advertising off the air, it left some potentially great work on the drawing board. And if they had a piece of creative they needed to cut down/compress, they might have relied on personal judgment.

This is where consumer neuroscience increasingly plays an important role for marketers. That’s because the current suite of tools combining EEG, eye tracking, facial coding and biometrics, along with self-report surveys, offer a unique opportunity. Not only can these tools measure and evaluate on a macro level (i.e., what works and what doesn’t), they go even deeper, providing moment-by-moment insight that can pinpoint where a spot(s) needs to be adjusted. The results enable a collaborative approach between marketers, creative agencies and researchers to help go from early stage to primetime success—avoiding the cutting-room floor that has claimed too many could-have-been-great ads. This is because consumer neuroscience measures what traditional research methods cannot. Methods like surveys can only tap into our conscious responses, which we know are often heavily biased and are only one, arguably smaller, component of how we consume media. Studies have shown that the majority of our decision-making happens non-consciously, so much of what drives everyday decisions—including what we’ll purchase, watch and talk about—requires tools that can measure these responses.

Several years ago, we developed a model designed to understand the explosion in content platforms and the types of creative that can be optimized for each. Our Brand Immersion Model became a framework for defining the relationship between the immersive platform of TV and digital’s flexible platforms. Our research found that TV, through its unmatched ability to create new, unconscious emotional connections, has the power to form need states—which make consumers receptive to brand messages—where none existed before. Flexible environments play a key role in reinforcing need states. So the two work together in powerful, synergistic ways.

It’s important to understand this relationship in order to develop creative that will be great on each platform. The Brand Immersion Model breaks down the two primary ways to engage with content:

Highly Immersive Platforms: Viewers are more apt to be passive participants, observing content that substitutes the viewers’ emotional state with the emotional lives of the onscreen characters. If those characters need a product, the viewer feels that same need. Examples include television, virtual reality, theaters and home theaters, IMAX and events like the Olympics. Immersive content enables us to experience others and generate need states that previously did not exist.

Highly Flexible Platforms: Viewers are more apt to be active participants, constantly searching for something that engages them. This content requires the need to already become established. The content or advertising then supports this need. Examples include smartphones and tablets with email, social media and the websites that provide a never-ending search for more. Flexible content enables us to develop our own experience and satisfy need states that already exist.

Television is highly effective as an advertising platform because it is the primary medium that can create a need state, either through experiencing the needs of the onscreen characters during the primary content or through the high emotional involvement with on-screen characters during the advertising itself.

With flexible experiences, individuals seek out an experience more customized to their interests. For the most successful executions, this can result in higher engagement with content than on an immersive platform because it’s tailored to what the consumer is seeking. The reason for this heightened engagement is that the content is user-generated—people seek to broaden their conversations with each other and trusted sources like influencers instead of with the stories of new characters in an advertisement. Unless the ad is for a product the consumer already knows that he or she wants at that moment and it takes up enough of the screen to get noticed without turning the viewer “off,” it cannot generate the same level of connection.

So how do you ensure that your creative and different platforms go hand-in-hand for the most optimal engagement? How can we move from must-skip to must-watch? And how do we turn turn-out into tune-in? It’s simple: tap into the full spectrum of consumers’ responses— both conscious and non-conscious—to uncover areas of emotional impact, visual hot spots, blind spots and inform the strongest possible creative development.

Para saber mais, inscreva-se para o próximo webinar em 25 de outubro ou sob demanda.

Continue navegando por ideias semelhantes